Site icon Apparel Design Hub

Exploring different product-service combinations for sustainable clothing rental service based on consumer preferences and climate change impacts

Exploring different product-service combinations for sustainable clothing rental service based on consumer preferences and climate change impacts
  • Mukendi, A. & Henninger, C. E. Exploring the spectrum of fashion rental. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 24, 455–469 (2020).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouri, M. J. Eight impacts of the digital sharing economy on resource consumption. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 168, 105434 (2021).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Iran, S. & Schrader, U. Collaborative fashion consumption and its environmental effects. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 21, 468–482 (2017).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjoman, A. Zara: IT for Fast Fashion. Harvard Business School Cases (2004).

  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation. A New Textiles Economy: Redesigning Fashion’s Future (2017).

  • Zamani, B., Sandin, G. & Peters, G. M. Life cycle assessment of clothing libraries: Can collaborative consumption reduce the environmental impact of fast fashion?. J. Clean Prod. 162, 1368–1375 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Piontek, F. M., Amasawa, E. & Kimita, K. Environmental implication of casual wear rental services: Case of Japan and Germany. Proced. CIRP 90, 724–729 (2020).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. & Plepys, A. Product-service systems and sustainability: Analysing the environmental impacts of rental clothing. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13, 1–30 (2021).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Levänen, J., Uusitalo, V., Härri, A., Kareinen, E. & Linnanen, L. Innovative recycling or extended use? Comparing the global warming potential of different ownership and end-of-life scenarios for textiles. Environ. Res. Lett. 16(5), 054069 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Amasawa, E., Brydges, T., Henninger, C. E. & Kimita, K. Can rental platforms contribute to more sustainable fashion consumption? Evidence from a mixed-method study. Clean. Responsib. Consum. 8, 100103 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rent the Runway. RTR commissions first comprehensive study of clothing rental model’s impact; finds renting yields net environmental yields net environmental savings compared to buying clothes. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/rtr-commissions-first-comprehensive-study-clothing-rental-/ (2021).

  • Lang, C., Li, M. & Zhao, L. Understanding consumers’ online fashion renting experiences: A text-mining approach. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 21, 132–144 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Niinimäki, K. Eco-Clothing, consumer identity and ideology. Sustain. Dev. 18, 150–162 (2010).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bly, S., Gwozdz, W. & Reisch, L. A. Exit from the high street: An exploratory study of sustainable fashion consumption pioneers. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 39, 2 (2015).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, C. M., Niinimäki, K., Kujala, S., Karell, E. & Lang, C. Sustainable product-service systems for clothing: Exploring consumer perceptions of consumption alternatives in Finland. J. Clean Prod. 97, 30–39 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, C. Perceived risks and enjoyment of access-based consumption: identifying barriers and motivations to fashion renting. Fash. Text. 5, 23 (2018).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenheimer, M., Schuler, J. & Wilkening, T. Drivers and barriers to fashion rental for everyday garments: An empirical analysis of a former fashion-rental company. Sustain.: Sci. Pract. Policy 18, 344–356 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khitous, F., Urbinati, A. & Verleye, K. Product-Service Systems: A customer engagement perspective in the fashion industry. J. Clean Prod. 336, 130394 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Reim, W., Parida, V. & Örtqvist, D. Product-Service Systems (PSS) business models and tactics – A systematic literature review. J. Clean Prod. 97, 61–75 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaiardelli, P., Resta, B., Martinez, V., Pinto, R. & Albores, P. A classification model for product-service offerings. J. Clean Prod. 66, 507–519 (2014).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Koide, R., Yamamoto, H., Kimita, K., Nishino, N. & Murakami, S. Circular business cannibalization: A hierarchical bayes conjoint analysis on reuse, refurbishment, and subscription of home appliances. J. Clean Prod. 422, 138580 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Amasawa, E., Shibata, T., Sugiyama, H. & Hirao, M. Environmental potential of reusing, renting, and sharing consumer products: Systematic analysis approach. J. Clean Prod. 242, 118487 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Koide, R., Murakami, S. & Nansai, K. Prioritising low-risk and high-potential circular economy strategies for decarbonisation: A meta-analysis on consumer-oriented product-service systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 155, 111858 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Meshulam, T., Goldberg, S., Ivanova, D. & Makov, T. The sharing economy is not always greener: A review and consolidation of empirical evidence. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 013004 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukker, A. Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy – a review. J. Clean Prod. 97, 76–91 (2015).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjaer, L. L., Pagoropoulos, A., Schmidt, J. H. & McAloone, T. C. Challenges when evaluating product/service-systems through Life cycle assessment. J. Clean Prod. 120, 95–104 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro, C. G., Trevisan, A. H., Pigosso, D. C. A. & Mascarenhas, J. The rebound effect of circular economy: Definitions, mechanisms and a research agenda. J. Clean. Prod. 345, 131136 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, C. M., Niinimäki, K., Lang, C. & Kujala, S. A use-oriented clothing economy? Preliminary affirmation for sustainable clothing consumption alternatives. Sustain. Dev. 24, 18–31 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Herold, P. I. & Prokop, D. Is fast fashion finally out of season? Rental clothing schemes as a sustainable and affordable alternative to fast fashion. Geoforum 146, 103873 (2023).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, J. J. & Zeckhauser, R. J. Owning, using and renting: Some simple economics of the sharing economy. SSRN Electron. J. (2016).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Edbring, E. G., Lehner, M. & Mont, O. Exploring consumer attitudes to alternative models of consumption: Motivations and barriers. J. Clean Prod. 123, 5–15 (2016).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Durgee, J. F. & Colarelli O’Connor, G. An exploration into renting as consumption behavior. Psychol. Mark. 12, 89–105 (1995).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifset, R. Moving from products to services. J. Ind. Ecol. 4, 1–2 (2000).

    ADS 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rademaekers, K., Svatilkova, K., Vermeulen, J., Smit, T. & Baroni, L. Environmental Potential of the Collaborative Economy (2018).

  • Tunn, V. S. C., Van den Hende, E. A., Bocken, N. M. P. & Schoormans, J. P. L. Consumer adoption of access-based product-service systems: The influence of duration of use and type of product. Bus Strateg. Environ. 30, 2796–2813 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Henninger, C. E., Amasawa, E., Brydges, T. & Piontek, F. M. My wardrobe in the cloud: An international comparison of fashion rental. In Handbook of Research on the Platform Economy and the Evolution of E-Commerce (ed. Ertz, M.) 153–175. (IGI Global, 2021)

  • Chua, J. M. The environment and economy are paying the price for fast fashion – but there’s hope VOX (2019).

  • Baek, E. & Grace Oh, G. E. Diverse values of fashion rental service and contamination concern of consumers. J. Bus Res. 123(165), 175 (2021).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepp, I. G., Laitala, K. & Wiedemann, S. Clothing lifespans: What should be measured and how. Sustainability (Switzerland) 12, 1–21 (2020).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrigo, E. Collaborative consumption in the fashion industry: A systematic literature review and conceptual framework. J. Clean Prod. 325, 129261 (2021).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Piontek, F. M., Rapaport, M. & Müller, M. One year of clothing consumption of a German female consumer. Proced. CIRP 80, 417–421 (2019).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Klint, E., Johansson, L. O. & Peters, G. No stain, no pain–A multidisciplinary review of factors underlying domestic laundering. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 84, 102442 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan Association of Specialists in Textiles and Apparel. Report on Clothing Consumption (in Japanese) (2020).

  • Tukker, A. Eight types of product-service system: Eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from suspronet. Bus Strateg. Environ. 13, 246–260 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Camacho-Otero, J., Boks, C. & Pettersen, I. N. User acceptance and adoption of circular offerings in the fashion sector: Insights from user-generated online reviews. J. Clean Prod. 231, 928–939 (2019).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mont, O., Dalhammar, C. & Jacobsson, N. A new business model for baby prams based on leasing and product remanufacturing. J. Clean Prod. 14, 1509–1518 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mont, O. Reducing life-cycle environmental impacts through systems of joint use. Greener Manag. Int. 63, 15P (2004).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurisu, K., Ikeuchi, R., Nakatani, J. & Moriguchi, Y. Consumers’ motivations and barriers concerning various sharing services. J. Clean Prod. 308, 127269 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, S. J., Gleim, M. R., Perren, R. & Hwang, J. Freedom from ownership: An exploration of access-based consumption. J. Bus Res. 69, 2615–2623 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO. ISO 14040: Environmental management — life cycle assessment — principles and framework. Environ. Manag. 3, 28 (2006).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Niinimäki, K. et al. The environmental price of fast fashion. Nat. Rev. Earth. Environ. 1, 189–200 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan Environmental Management Association for Industry. IDEA (Inventory Database for Environmental Analysis) (2010).

  • The Japan Research Institute. Ministry of the Environment 2020 Report on Fashion and the Environment (in Japanese) (2021).

  • Dao, J. F. & Joyner Martinez, C. M. Defining sustainable clothing use: A taxonomy for future research. Int. J. Consum. Stud. (2024).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, D., Amasawa, E. & Hirao, M. Laundry habits in Bangkok: Use patterns of products and services. Sustainability (Switzerland) 11, 4486 (2019).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • METI. LCA Report on Textile Products (Clothing) (in Japanese) (2003).

  • link

    Exit mobile version